Understand why changes in education and health care mean that many schools, clinics, and universities are incorporating IPE/IPP into the way they work.
Check out real-life examples from ASHA members and ASHA's Special Interest Groups that highlight how IPE/IPP teams improved outcomes for students and patients.
November 8, 2021
Updated with additional clarifying information following the Supreme Court ruling on January 13, 2022.
An interim final rule (IFR) [PDF] issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will require select health care providers that receive Medicare and/or Medicaid reimbursement to vaccinate all staff against COVID-19 by January 4, 2022. A separate IFR [PDF], which has implications for all employers (health care and non-health care alike) with more than 100 employees, was issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The OSHA rule requires vaccination or testing of employees. The federal policies create a foundation for COVID-19 requirements; state and local laws may vary when providing more prescriptive guidance such as 100% vaccination requirements for certain professionals. Individuals must follow the most stringent requirements that apply.
CMS and OSHA will accept comments on the IFR through January 4, 2022.
Numerous lawsuits were filed on Friday, November 5, against the OSHA IFR. On Saturday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit suspended implementation of the IFR until it is assessed in greater depth.
On Thursday January 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked enforcement of the OSHA rule requiring vaccination or testing of employees for employers with over 100 employees. The Administration has not indicated whether they will continue to pursue a vaccination requirement for employers under OSHA.
(updated 1/13/22)
The Supreme Court upheld the vaccination requirements for select health care providers, but the compliance deadline may be adjusted. The IFR's vaccine requirements apply to the following categories of Medicare CMS regulated facility types:
Clinicians working in private practices, group practices, and in other non-facility settings with fewer than 100 employees are not subject to either IFR. School-based providers are also explicitly exempt as CMS does not regulate schools.
In the rule and associated educational resources (see question: Do the new COVID-19 staff vaccination requirements apply to my therapy practice? [PDF]), CMS stated that they used their authority to regulate health care facilities and that clinicians, such as audiologists and speech-language pathologists, working in settings not subject to facility related CMS Conditions of Participation, Conditions of Coverage, or Requirements are exempt from the HHS IFR.
Requirements for covered entities:
Health care providers who are subject to these requirements must develop and maintain written policies, including exemption processes, and must maintain records demonstrating compliance with the vaccine requirements. The health care provider must maintain records of vaccination status such as a copy or picture of the staff member’s vaccination card. Documentation of medical exemptions should include:
For employees who are granted a religious or medical exemption, the health care provider must establish policies for additional precautions such as, but not limited to, testing, physical distancing, and remote work options. CMS requires covered facilities to ensure that act to minimize the risk of transmitting COVID-19.
CMS will use a state survey agency process to monitor compliance and may implement civil money penalties, denial of payment for new admissions, or termination of the Medicare/Medicaid provider agreements depending on the level of noncompliance.
(updated 1/13/22)
The U.S. Supreme Court blocked implementation of this rule on January 13, 2022.
OSHA issued an emergency temporary standard (ETS) to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers (100+ employees) from the risk of contracting COVID-19. However, this rule will not go into effect after the U.S. Supreme Court blocked its implementation.
The rule originally required covered employers to strongly encourage vaccination and develop, implement, and enforce a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy or adopt a policy requiring employees to either get vaccinated or wear a face covering at work and undergo regular COVID-19 testing. This was intended as a temporary rule known as an ETS (emergency temporary standard).
The rule was meant to go into effect on November 5, 2021, and gave employers until December 5, 2021, to meet all requirements except testing for unvaccinated employees. Employers were to implement the testing requirements for all employees who had not yet completed the entire primary dose(s) of a COVID-19 vaccine by January 4, 2022. This testing rule would not have applied to any settings where the CMS Vaccination rule applies; the CMS rule would have superseded the OSHA rule for as long as the CMS rule remains in effect.
Employers who have already developed a vaccination policy that is at least as prescriptive as the requirements outlined in the OSHA rule would not have needed to develop or implement a new policy.
Requirements for covered entities:
Showing evidence of a previous COVID-19 infection would not have replaced the vaccination or masking and testing requirements under this rule. OSHA indicates that there is not enough scientific or statistical evidence to show that a COVID infection would lead to the same sustained immunity as a full primary vaccination.
OSHA offers a short summary [PDF], FAQs, and a fact sheet [PDF] on the ETS for COVID Vaccination and Testing. Employers with less than 100 employees are not subject to this rule but are encouraged to adopt similar policies. However, this temporary rule was challenged in court and blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Contact reimbursement@asha.org.